GAMSAT Pro by Auri.med

For prospective medical students · GAMSAT Pro

Sit the GAMSAT here, before you sit it for real.

AI-powered GAMSAT preparation — stimulus-grouped MCQs across all three sections, written-task prompts with LLM feedback, timed mocks, and section-by-section insights.

Six tools below — each one is a tab on the live station panel. Browse without signing in.

station · live preview sample content

Plate 01 · Section III · sciences

Stimulus-grouped science MCQs, the real GAMSAT shape.

Each stimulus — a graph, table, reaction scheme, free-body diagram — carries 2–5 questions. Reasoning from new information, not recall of facts you've memorised. 40% chemistry, 40% biology, 20% physics, matching ACER's split.

  • 01

    Stimulus first

    Read the graph, then answer 2–5 questions tied to it. No standalone trivia.

  • 02

    Explanations every time

    Why the right answer is right, and why each distractor was tempting.

  • 03

    Discipline balance

    40/40/20 across chem · bio · physics. Sit a paper and the mix is calibrated.

Chemistry · acid-base equilibria

Figure 1. Titration curve of 25.0 mL of a weak monoprotic acid (HA) with 0.100 M NaOH.

Equivalence point at VNaOH ≈ 25 mL · pH ≈ 8.7 · half-equivalence pH ≈ 4.74

Which value best estimates the pKa of HA, and why?

ApKa ≈ 4.74 — at half-equivalence, [HA] = [A⁻], so pH = pKa by Henderson–Hasselbalch
BpKa ≈ 8.7 — the equivalence-point pH equals pKa for any weak acid
CpKa ≈ 7.0 — the inflection point of the titration curve
DpKa cannot be determined without the initial pH of the acid
Correct — option A. At half-equivalence, half of the weak acid is neutralised, leaving [HA] = [A⁻]. Henderson–Hasselbalch reduces to pH = pKa. The equivalence-point pH > 7 reflects the basicity of A⁻, not the pKa of HA. This is a stimulus-driven Section III item — the graph supplies the data; the chemistry supplies the reasoning.
Humanities · Q1 of 3

The new tools arrive promising leisure. Each generation greets them the same way — washing machines, microwaves, email, AI — with a small inward bow of relief: at last, something will do this for me. And each generation, within a few years, finds itself working longer hours than before. The labour saved is not returned to the labourer; it accrues to whoever owns the labour-saving device. The promise of leisure was always a promise of productivity in disguise.

— original passage

The author's central claim is best summarised as:

ALabour-saving technologies transfer the value of saved time from workers to owners
BModern technology has failed to deliver leisure because of poor design
CEach generation is too quick to embrace new tools without scepticism
DProductivity gains from technology are inevitable and morally neutral
Correct — option A. The author's pivot — "The labour saved is not returned to the labourer; it accrues to whoever owns the labour-saving device" — is the load-bearing claim. B and C describe surface observations the passage makes in passing; D contradicts the passage. Section I tests *reading the argument*, not just the topic.

Plate 02 · Section I · humanities

Reasoning from prose, poetry, cartoons, diagrams.

Every stimulus is original — written for GAMSAT-shaped reasoning. Each one carries 2–5 questions on close reading, author intent, argument evaluation, inference. ACER's emphasis: novel application, not recall.

  • 01

    Stimulus variety

    Prose fiction and non-fiction, poetry, plays, cartoons, tables, diagrams — the full ACER range.

  • 02

    Original passages

    Commissioned originals across themes. Never paraphrased from published authors.

  • 03

    Tagged by skill

    Main idea, intent, inference, argument flaw — track which skill you keep missing.

Plate 03 · Section II · written task

Task A and Task B prompts, graded by an LLM examiner.

Four quotes on a theme — write a coherent response. Your essay is read by an LLM examiner three independent times across two criteria (Thought-and-content, Organisation-and-expression), then averaged. Variance is shown, so you see how stable your score is.

  • 01

    ACER-shaped prompts

    Task A (socio-cultural) and Task B (personal/reflective). Four quotes per prompt, just like the real exam.

  • 02

    3 independent reads

    Each essay graded three times, mean-of-three. Variance visible so you can see grader uncertainty.

  • 03

    Exam-mode timing

    Optional 30-minute countdown — toggle on for a realistic Section II sit.

Task A · Justice and punishment

"The degree of civilisation in a society can be judged by entering its prisons."

— Fyodor Dostoevsky

"Punishment is justice for the unjust."

— attributed, Saint Augustine

"A society that has more prisoners than university graduates has misunderstood both."

— anonymous, oral history, 2003

"Mercy is the fairest mark of justice."

— Mary Shelley

Write a structured response engaging with the ideas above. You may agree, disagree, or complicate any of the positions.

Start writing here…
0 words 29:42 Submit for grading
68%
Overall accuracy
312 items · 14-day window
Section I — humanities74%
Section III — biology71%
Section III — chemistry66%
Section III — physics54%
Section II — Task A6.4 / 10
Section II — Task B7.1 / 10
Focus area · this week
Section III — Physics. Mechanics + waves, 54% over 14 days.

Plate 04 · per-section insights

Where you actually stand, by section.

Section-by-section accuracy across every item you've answered, rolling 14-day window. Section II essays included with their mean LLM score. The weakest section is highlighted — that's where tomorrow's set starts.

  • 01

    Real attempts, not estimates

    Computed from your actual answers, never a self-rating.

  • 02

    Section-aware

    S1, S2, S3 tracked separately — and S3 broken down by discipline.

  • 03

    Picked-for-you focus

    The lowest section with enough volume becomes tomorrow's recommended drill.

GAMSAT essentials · card 12 of 24

SN2 vs E2 selectivity. Given: - secondary alkyl halide - strong, bulky base (e.g. t-BuOK) - polar aprotic solvent (DMSO) Which mechanism dominates, and what is the single most important reason?

tap to reveal
Answer

E2 dominates. The bulky base cannot easily reach the α-carbon for SN2 backside attack, but it can readily abstract the β-hydrogen. Polar aprotic + secondary + bulky strong base ⇒ elimination wins. • Strong + bulky base → favours E2 • Polar aprotic → both SN2 and E2 enabled, but steric is decisive • Tertiary substrate would push even further to E2 / E1

tap to flip back
12 / 24

Plate 05 · flashcards

Spaced repetition, seeded from your weak topics.

Cards you nearly miss reappear sooner. Decks seeded from your weakest Section III topics this week — so the next 15 minutes of revision starts where it matters.

  • 01

    Default-on spacing

    SM-2 schedules each card; no deck construction needed.

  • 02

    Reasoning, not labels

    Cards prompt mechanism + reasoning, not single-word recall.

  • 03

    Add your own

    Anything you read in a textbook — paste it, tag it, it joins the cadence.

Plate 06 · exam mode

Sit a full Section III paper. 75 items, 150 minutes.

Real ACER timing and shape. Flagging grid, no drip-fed feedback until the bell. The debrief afterwards links each miss back to a topic, a card, or a stimulus to revisit.

  • 01

    One paper, one debrief

    No interruptions during. After: one scrollable page linking every miss to what closes the gap.

  • 02

    Flag & return

    The grid tells you what's answered, flagged, and untouched — at a glance.

  • 03

    Real GAMSAT timing

    75 items at the actual 150-minute clock. Pacing tested honestly.

Section III Paper · Q12 / 75 2:18:42

Q12 — A 2.0 kg trolley moving at 3.0 m/s collides inelastically with a stationary 4.0 kg trolley on a frictionless track. What is the velocity of the combined mass immediately after collision?

A0.5 m/s
B1.0 m/s
C1.5 m/s
D2.0 m/s
live demo · no sign-in · Every tab is real GAMSAT Pro content, paused.
Press play in your account →

About GAMSAT Pro

AI-powered prep for the Graduate Medical School Admissions Test.

GAMSAT Pro is an AI-powered Graduate Medical School Admissions Test prep platform. Practise Section I reasoning across prose, poetry and diagrams; draft Section II essays against Task A and Task B prompt sets with LLM-graded feedback; sit Section III stimulus-grouped MCQs across chemistry, biology and physics — with insights that pinpoint your weakest section.

Two human promises

AI on the inside. Humans on the outside.

We use AI to make practice realistic, instant and tireless. But the things that matter — the questions, the marksheets, the answer when you email us — come from real doctors.

01 · Content

Every case, question and marksheet is human-verified.

Practising doctors and examiners write and review every simulated patient, MCQ, viva, flashcard and rubric before it reaches you. AI helps us scale; it never replaces the clinician at the keyboard.

Human-verified content
02 · Support

A fully human, responsive support team.

When you email [email protected] you reach a real person — usually a doctor or medical student — not a chatbot. We typically reply within 24 hours, often the same day.

Real humans on support

Six tools, three sections.

Stimulus-grouped MCQs across humanities and sciences. LLM-graded essays for the written task. A 75-question timed paper. Insights that tell you which section to revise next.

01

Section III · sciences

Stimulus-grouped MCQs. 40% chem, 40% bio, 20% physics, matching ACER's split.

02

Section I · humanities

Original prose, poetry, cartoons, tables. Close reading and argument evaluation.

03

Section II · written task

Task A and Task B prompts. LLM-graded with 3 independent reader passes.

04

Per-section insights

Accuracy tracked separately for S1, S2 and S3 so you know where to focus next.

05

Flashcards

SM-2 spaced repetition seeded from your weakest topics this week.

06

Exam mode

Full 75-question Section III paper at ACER timing, with debrief.

Get started

Ready to sit the GAMSAT?

Candidates already using GAMSAT Pro to prepare with confidence.

Get started →

About us

Built by Australian doctors.

Auri was built by a group of Australian doctors who have a passion for making medical education and exam study as efficient as possible.

The team

  • Raymond

    GP, Adelaide, SA

    FRACGP, M.D. (Griffith University)

  • George

    Ophthalmology Registrar, Sydney, NSW

    M.D. (University of Melbourne)

  • Marie

    ENT Registrar, Adelaide, SA

    M.D. (Griffith University)

  • Tasneem

    GP, Adelaide, SA

    FRACGP, M.D. (Griffith University)

Auri / GAMSAT Pro
a quieter way to learn very large things